MCP vs Claude Skills: Infrastructure vs Instructions
MCP is production-grade infrastructure with real security and reliability. Claude Skills? Glorified RAG with Markdown files. Here's when you need each.
AI agents need two things: access to data and instructions on what to do with it.
Anthropic shipped two solutions: MCP (Model Context Protocol) in November 2024 and Claude Skills in October 2025. They sound similar. They're not.
MCP is infrastructure. Skills are instructions. One is production-grade with security and reliability baked in. The other is essentially RAG with Markdown files. Let's break it down.
MCP: Production Infrastructure That Doesn't Break
MCP is an open protocol that connects AI agents to external systems. Not through fragile API wrappers or one-off integrations, but through standardized, persistent, secure connections.
Security First
This is where MCP shines and where most "AI integration" solutions fall apart.
Token Validation: Every MCP connection validates tokens at the protocol level. You're not rolling your own OAuth flows or managing session tokens in application code. The protocol handles it.
Secure Transports: MCP supports HTTPS and stdio with built-in authentication. Your data doesn't travel in plain text. Your credentials don't leak through logs.
Session Management: Persistent sessions mean you authenticate once, not on every request. But here's the key: sessions are scoped and can be revoked. You get both convenience and control.
Access Control: MCP servers define granular permissions. Your agent can read from a database but not write. It can search GitHub repos but not push code. This isn't an afterthought—it's in the protocol spec.
Reliability That Scales
Persistent Connections: Once connected, the agent maintains a session. No re-authentication hell. No connection drops forcing retries. The agent can work through multi-step workflows without losing context.
Standardized Error Handling: When something breaks (and it will), MCP gives you structured errors. Not vague HTTP 500s. Actual error codes you can handle programmatically.
JSON Schema Validation: Every tool, every response is schema-validated. Your agent doesn't have to guess the data structure. Type safety from the protocol up.
Production Deployments: Companies like Block use MCP in production. Remote deployments. Multiple concurrent agents. Real enterprise workloads. This isn't a demo toy.
The Ecosystem
Pre-built MCP servers exist for:
- GitHub (code search, PR management)
- PostgreSQL (database queries)
- Slack (messaging, channel management)
- Puppeteer (browser automation)
- Google Drive (file access)
You don't build from scratch. You configure and deploy.
Real Use Case
An enterprise agent that:
- Queries your internal database (via MCP)
- Fetches relevant documents (via MCP)
- Posts summaries to Slack (via MCP)
- Maintains audit logs of all data access
All with token validation, session management, and error handling built-in. That's MCP.
Claude Skills: RAG with Markdown Files
Claude Skills launched with a lot of hype about "modular expertise" and "procedural knowledge." Strip away the marketing: it's progressive disclosure RAG using Markdown files.
How It Actually Works
The Index (Metadata): A YAML frontmatter (~100 tokens) that Claude scans at session start. This is your retrieval index. Claude checks if the Skill is relevant to the current task.
The Retrieval (Instructions): If relevant, Claude loads the full Markdown file (<5,000 tokens). This contains step-by-step instructions, examples, guidelines.
The Augmentation (Resources): Optional scripts or reference files loaded on-demand. Python scripts for data processing. Config files for formatting rules.
It's RAG. With files. That's it.
What It's Good For
Skills excel at repeatable workflows:
- Brand guidelines (colors, fonts, tone)
- Data analysis templates (always filter by X, format as Y)
- Code style enforcement (use these patterns, avoid these)
Basically, anything you'd put in a company wiki or SOP document.
The Reality Check
Token-Efficient? Yes. Progressive disclosure means you don't load everything upfront.
Revolutionary? No. It's file-based retrieval with nice packaging.
Limitation: Skills can't access external data. They can tell Claude how to process data, but not where to get the data. That's MCP's job.
The Real Difference
| Aspect | MCP | Claude Skills |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Infrastructure - connects to systems | Instructions - guides agent behavior |
| Security | Token validation, secure transports, access control | No security layer (just Markdown files) |
| Reliability | Persistent connections, error handling, production-ready | File-based, no connection management |
| Complexity | Requires server setup, configuration | Drop Markdown files in a folder |
| Token Cost | Can be high for complex schemas | Low, progressive disclosure |
| Data Access | Yes - live connections to databases, APIs, tools | No - only provides instructions |
| Open Standard | Yes - works with any LLM | Claude-specific (but concept is portable) |
The Truth:
- MCP handles security, reliability, and data access
- Skills handle consistency and reusable instructions
- MCP is infrastructure; Skills are documentation
When to Use What
Use MCP when:
- You need live data from external systems
- Security and access control matter
- You're building for production
- You need audit trails and error handling
- Your agent integrates with enterprise tools
Use Claude Skills when:
- You have repeatable workflows
- You want consistent outputs (formatting, tone, structure)
- You don't need external data
- You want simple, file-based configuration
Use Both when:
- Building serious agents
- Skills guide how to use MCP-fetched data
- Example: A Skill defines your data analysis format, MCP fetches the data from your database
The Winning Combination
Here's the pattern that actually works:
- MCP fetches live data from your database
- Claude Skills define how to analyze that data (filters, grouping, format)
- Agent executes the workflow with both context (MCP) and instructions (Skills)
Without MCP, your agent has no data. Without Skills, your agent lacks consistency. Together, they're powerful.
But make no mistake: MCP is doing the heavy lifting. Skills are the guardrails.
Build with LeanMCP SDK
If you're building with MCP, you need proper tooling. The official SDK is verbose. LeanMCP SDK handles the boilerplate:
import { Tool, createHTTPServer } from "@leanmcp/core";
class DatabaseService {
@Tool({ description: 'Query customer data' })
async queryCustomers(input: { filter: string }) {
// Your query logic
// Security, validation, error handling - all built in
return results;
}
}
Security, session management, transport handling - all abstracted.
Resources
MCP is infrastructure. Skills are instructions. Know the difference. Build accordingly.